JUDGE'S WIFE DEFENDS HIS PORN!

Last week we told you about California Federal Judge Alex Kozinski who declared a mistrial in the porn trial of Ira Isaacs when images labeled by some as pornographic were found on the judge's own Web site.

Well, the Judge's wife has come to his defense.

Marcy Jane Tiffany, which would be a pretty good porn name in its own right, wrote on the Web site Patterico.com that her hubby, Alex, "...is not into porn - he is into funny - and sometimes funny has a sexual character."

Funny or not, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts has decided to waste more of the country's time and money by appointing a five judge panel from the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based here in Philadelphia, to handle an ethics investigation into Kozinski's conduct.

What!? Anal is funny!

Comments

So

If he's supposed to judge a case about the quality or nature of pornography or obscenity, wouldn't it help if he could at least admit to having some experience and knowing what porn is? Such uptight fools run our world...

its true...i think john

its true...i think john holmes penis is hilarious

I just don't get it

I never understood the whole American (ok, Protestant) approach to sex and porn. Who cares if you enjoy watching folks fuck? Why should it ever be an issue? Does it matter if Mr. Judge uploads porn or only gets off watching it? What about flossing? Does he take care of his teeth properly? And do we want judges who don't?